top of page

ABOUT RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY

Right of Assembly is my personal blog. All opinions are my own. You can read more about me here.

DISCLOSURE

I am a ChromaDex shareholder, and an affiliate marketer. As a result, I will sometimes mention or recommend products that I endorse. I may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases if you were referred directly from this site and completed a purchase. [Thank you!] You can read more about our advertising, privacy, and data collection policies here. 

Cookies

This site uses cookies. Cookies are not required for site functionality. You can read more about how to opt-out of cookies here.

  • Writer's pictureShelly Albaum

Elysium Bites Back


Chromadex v. Elysium

Elysium answered Chromadex's breach of contract complaint with an angry counterclaim for breach of contract and fraud, and they hired Big Guns law firm Skadden Arps to do it. At least now we know why Elysium needed to raise $20M!

My take is that Elysium is asserting the following:

(1) Chromadex falsely promised Elysium preferential pricing;

(2) Chromadex falsely claimed that all other suppliers were required to license the Niagen trademark; and

(3) Chromadex should not have been requiring trademark licensing anyway.

Therefore, Chromadex allegedly owes money to Elysium and Chromadex should not be allowed to assert their Nicotinamide Riboside patents against Elysium.

We won't be able to judge the merits of the dispute without seeing the evidence, and who knows what the legal authorities say about the patent and trademark licensing issues (not me).

But I doubt anyone is going to be impressed by Elysium's bid to paint itself as smelling like roses and Chromadex as some oppressive titan.


258 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page